In Of Mice and Men Steinbeck presents a totally pessimistic view of life where dreams offer the only escape? Essay

Guys corresponding us that work on ranches atomic number 18 the loneliest abuses in the worldwith us it aint like thatbecause I got you to look after me, and you got me to look after you. Perhaps of Mice and Men bunghole be perceived as a totally pessimistic reflectance of what life in 1930s America was like, solely through the unique relationship betwixt George and Lennie and the natural dignity of Slim, a balance between the good and the bad, the happy and the unhappy is achieved.The p bent-child relationship shared between George and Lennie passim the novel is certainly a good thing. From the start of the novel, we see George as a responsible character, a parent substitute to Lennie, whose loyalty seems more(prenominal) through kindness than a sense of duty. He reminds Lennie that (his) aunt Clara would like (him) running off by (himself) and nonwithstanding when he is severely provoke by Lennie to speak harshly to him, he soon feels chargeable and apologises I been m ean, aint I?. Lennie, on the other hand, acts like a child, unaware of the weightyships he and George face end-to-end the novel. He pleads with George to let him grip the rats he finds and needs George to repeat to him words and phrases so that he john remember them Lennieyou remember what I told you? Lennie raised his elbow and his face distort with thought.Yet although George is Lennies opposite, he continues to care for him throughout the novel, even at the end when he chooses to end Lennie life himself or else than watch him suffer under the wrath of Curley Lennie dies at the hand of the part he trusts, still believing in his dream, painlessly, happy and free Lennie jarred, and and so settled slowly forward to the sand, and he lay without quivering. still perhaps it is this dream that makes this novel seem so pessimistic it is what manifestly keeps them together yet at the end it is shattered, and with it, George and Lennies friendship comes to a shocking end. The drea m is of a very small farm, a precise place, which they own themselves, a dream of working for themselves and of being the ones in charge If we dont like a guy we contribute say Get the hell out, and by God hes got to do it. It is powerful enough to draw in Candy and, temporally, even the cynical Crooks. Yet although this dream offers an escape from reality and even when the try for of exemption seemed possible, it is shattered and George is left with no other option but to shoot his one and only ally in the struggle against a confederation which finds it difficult to imagine than one can fall in a friend to share his fears and sorrows with I never see one guy take so much trouble for anotherPerhaps Lennies death is down to fate and destiny, the fact that neither he nor George had any(prenominal) control over their lives, as reflected by Slims afflictive words at the end of the novel, You hadda George. I swear you hadda, or maybe it is in fact down to the rootless American s ociety of the 1930s.So to conclude, although George and Lennies friendship and Slims natural dignity are two good things, Lennies death and the collapse of the dream he and George believed in at the end of the novel leads one to feel that, during the Depression, freedom and success were perhaps impossible to achieve. The American Dream, the key to American psychology, stated that great personal success could be gained by hard work and private success. Yet in truth many were not allowed to achieve this success. Such groups included itinerant workers and Black people who, in this novel, are represented by Crooks, a character openly referred to as nigger, which exemplifies the casual racism directed towards him by the others and although the ranch custody do not set out to insult him deliberately, the use of the confines nigger signals to us that black men like Crooks were constantly profligate both verbally and physically by whites.The storys heart-rending resultant leads one to r ealise that for most migrant workers, the reality of their social federal agency means that the American Dream cannot be realised. This truth is reflected by the far-famed trial of Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti, both Italian immigrants who realised the true force of societys bias in the 1920s. Sacco and Vanzetti were convicted of the murder of a paymaster and his guard and the looting of $15,776 from the Slater and Morrill Shoe factory and were later executed for their crimes.From the evidence and the pellucid biased feelings toward immigrants, the case became one where their culture was on trial as opposed to their actions and thus they were bound to be found guilty. Instead of upholding the heavenly judicial process cemented in the United States Constitution, the conviction of Sacco and Vanzetti resulted from the prejudice and favoritism of old-stock Americans in the 1920s. For Sacco and Vanzetti, their time was not an age of reason in American history. As both were gu ilty and proudly so- of a cultural crimeMy conviction is that I draw suffered for things I am guilty of. I am suffering because I am a positive and indeed I am a radical I have suffered because I was an Italian, and indeed I am an Italian I have suffered more for my family and for my beloved than for myself but I am so positive(p) to be right that if you could execute me two times, and if I could be born-again two other times, I would live again to do what I have done already.