Thursday, February 14, 2019
Singapore Essay example -- Singapore Politics, Government
How might the Singapore cabaret differ were it not for these technologies would the society be more or less heavily inflectd? leeward recommends analysing politics and society by addressing how power struggles and relations were played come forward in the pre- net income era, namely the maintenance of political control via macrocosm avow (2005 74). Foucault defines governmentality as the point of contact where the technologies of power interact with the governed. This spurs Lee to engage that, in order to retain power in the Internet era, governments necessity to be actively involved in shaping the design as well as the societal, cultural and regulatory environment in which the Internet and other new media technologies operate (2005 75). One example of how the Singapore government has apply technology to instil greater practice, and reinstate wavering public government agency is its online tax-filing system. The e-Filing system has been described as one of most definitive e-government projects, introduced by the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) as a trust-building tool (Tan et al., 2005 2). The e-filing system has been a conspicuous success for e-government. The success of the e-Filing system was extraordinary in cost of compliance, and succeeded in reversing negative public opinion at a phenomenal rate (Tan et al., 2005 2). Srivastava and Teo explored how the Singapore government utilised their citizen trust on the technology initiatives to promote and maintain trust for e-Government (2005 721). According to them, this was by and large achieved by fostering measures to build institutional trust via transparency and soliciting of feedback from citizens. They attributed the grand success of Singapores e-government programmes... ...s, which keep track of the users digital footprints and activities. physiologic surveillance, in the form of trawling the Internet and hacking computers is technically feasible but fiscally unfeasible. Suc h measure also compromise privacy and democracy. Conversely, employing legislation to regulate and/or control the Internet has a number of advantages in terms of the ease of execution, the feasibility, and the transparency of the judicial processes (Johal, 2004 4). However, legislature is purposely vague and the lecture ambiguous, allowing for flexibility of interpretation in the event of new developments (Endeshaw, 1996 210). For example, the Internet reckon of Practice that states that (p)rohibited material is material that is objectionable on the grounds of public interest, public morality, public order, public security, national harmony (in Johal, 2004 5).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment